bonded in heaven itself.
| An affinity, |
|
bonded in heaven itself.
Friday, 9 September 2011
Just read an article about the tightening of regulations with regards to the accessibility of research funds. I think what Mrs Liew has been saying is actually rather true, that "ideas are increasingly being monetised". A*star, for example, lies under the jurisdiction of the Singapore Government, and its parent ministry is apparent the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Hence, it makes sense that the funds are sourced from taxpayers' money. When the people's hard-earned money gets involved in the picture, there will inevitably be some form of bureaucracy, which is essentially the crux of the present problem. In order to justify the large amounts of money that goes into research, the gatekeepers of the funds, namely MTI and MOF, chooses economic key performance indicators to determine which ideas have the potential to reap the greatest benefits and thus are most deserving of the funding. Nice guys finish last. But is it justified that the most lucrative researches are rewarded with the largest amounts of fundings? Many of the great scientific achievements (really unnecessary to state examples, pretty sure you the reader are very well aware of some) had little ramifications on the industrialised economy. Does that mean that in the future, more and more researchers are gearing their compasses towards research that can reap the most monetary rewards? Sure, the notion of surviving in the competitive industry still holds true, but what I'm afraid is that the true essence and spirit behind scientific research is being diluted. And that, in my opinion, is the greatest issue regarding government-backed scientific research. The leaders of the countries, as well as related ministries, view R&D solely as a vehicle that can improve the long-term productive capacity of our economy, as well as simply raking in the cash. What scientists view their work, I believe, is the potential to bring about greater knowledge of the world that we live in. As you can see, these two vantage points are not exactly aligned, and tensions will always exist, no matter what. They really do, dammit. After reading the article, I think I have concluded that Singapore will never be a place where scientific research can thrive. For anyone who is a least bit interested to become a researcher (including myself, LOL), please look out of this island.
12:02
Yours Truly
Seventeen21 February
Whispers
Exits
Most are probably outdated or deleted but you can try your luck anyway :)
AmyAshley Bryan Heng Charmaine Chen Ee Clarence Dominic Doria Elgin Emersius Enan Fiona Gerald Haziq Hidayat Janice Jianghan Jingxin Joanne Jordan Kailiang Kaiyi Kimberley Manu Michelle Oglie Rochelle Sakif Sandesh Sebastian Sylvester Vincent Wee Bian Wei Jian Yang En Yong Jie Yunita Zheng Feng 08V11 2G'07 VSCO VJC Floorball My webfolio Archives
June 2007July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 Credits
Host: BloggerLayout © thebikiniboy |